Science and spirituality have spent years at odds with each other
They’ve been like two people stuck on opposite sides of a debate, arms crossed, refusing to budge. But recently, something has shifted. They’re inching closer—more curious colleagues than archenemies. At least, that’s how it’s starting to look.
And if I’ve learned anything, it’s that this merging of science and spirituality isn’t just happening in academic circles — it’s happening in boardrooms, relationships, and within ourselves.
In my past life I lived that divide
I spent years straddling the tension between logic and emotion, between data and intuition. And it wasn’t until I discovered NLP — and the fascinating science of how we actually make decisions — that I realised what was really happening.
Let me take you back to where it all began.
The emotional kid in a logical world
As a kid, I felt everything. I cried at cartoons (both the happy and sad parts — Disney films were an emotional minefield), apologised to furniture I bumped into, and even felt guilty for stepping on ants.
While this may sound like a weird superpower, it often felt more like a liability — especially when I entered the corporate world.
Fast-forward to the boardroom
I found myself working as an HR Manager, sitting at the table with a management team made up entirely of engineers and accountants.
Picture me — a heart-led, empathetic soul — beamed from an obscure planet into a world of logic and spreadsheets.

It was a power company, so their head-brained logic made sense. After all, you wouldn’t want someone too emotionally driven designing the national grid! And honestly, I loved those guys — even if they occasionally made me feel like the odd one out at a Spock convention.
Let’s just say, I was tuned into the emotional frequency of the room, while my colleagues were expertly wired into the world of facts and figures (pun intended!).
Logic vs. Emotion — A familiar divide
Every time I voiced a concern in meetings — “I don’t feel this plan is going to sit well with the line gangs” — I’d get hit with:
“Don’t tell us how you feel, tell us what you think.”
Translation?
Emotions and empathy weren’t considered real data. If it wasn’t measurable, it wasn’t valuable.
But guess what?
Time and again, my ‘unmeasurable’ instincts proved right.
Months later, when things started to unravel, I’d hear someone say, “Didn’t Steph mention this a while back?”
At the time, I couldn’t articulate why I knew something wouldn’t work—I just knew. But in a world that valued logic over intuition, those feelings didn’t count. It wasn’t until I discovered NLP that I learned how to translate what I was feeling into something others could understand — sometimes.
By refining my language, recognising patterns, and framing my insights in a way that resonated with logical thinkers, I was able to bridge the gap — expressing intuition in a way that even the most data-driven minds could hear.
In the meantime I adapted. I tuned into the logical part of me, prioritising data over instinct. I learned to suppress my natural tendencies.
But no matter how well I played the part, something always felt off — like I’d been stuffed into a stiff ‘logic suit’ two sizes too small.
The retreat that changed everything
Then came a turning point.
A new CEO brought in a consultant to lead our management team through a week of “team-building.” No, this wasn’t one of those kumbaya retreats where you leave with a dreamcatcher and questionable life choices.

Instead, it was a deep dive into decision-making styles and how we approached problems. I remember feeling unheard and sidelined in a lot of the activities.
Then, during one session, the consultant had a mic-drop moment:
The best teams don’t rely solely on logic—they balance logic, emotion, and intuition.
He pointed out how my empathic insights had been consistently ignored and how much faster the team could have solved problems if they’d listened to me.
For the first time, my contributions weren’t just acknowledged; they were validated!
It was like someone finally realised that intuition is data, too. Wow! I’m sure I grew 2 inches in stature!
But the real revelation came later when I discovered NLP and the neuroscience behind it.
The science behind intuition and decision-making
Not long after that retreat, I stumbled across NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) and, more specifically, mBIT (multiple Brain Integration Techniques).
That’s when everything clicked.
What the consultant had revealed wasn’t just a business insight — it was backed by science.
We don’t just have one brain—we have three.
The three brains (and why they matter)
The Head Brain (Logic & Creativity): The domain of analysis, problem-solving, and innovation. My management team practically lived here.
The Heart Brain (Compassion & Values): Where empathy, connection, and meaning reside. This was my natural default.
The Gut Brain (Courage & Instinct): The seat of action and intuition. The “I don’t know why, but this doesn’t feel right” response comes from here.
When these three brains work together, decision-making becomes powerful.
This wasn’t woo-woo. It was neuroscience.

Bridging science and spirituality
So where does spirituality come in?
For me, spirituality is about trusting the deeper intelligence within us—our intuition, our emotions, our connection to something greater.
Science and spirituality— Validation
And what’s fascinating is that modern science is now validating what spiritual traditions have been saying for centuries.
- Neuroplasticity – Our brains can rewire themselves based on thought and experience. Translation? You’re not stuck with old patterns — you can create new ones.
- Heart Coherence – Research shows the heart sends more signals to the brain than the brain sends to the heart. This is why practices like gratitude and mindfulness improve emotional resilience.
- Quantum Physics – The observer effect suggests that where we place our focus changes reality. Sound familiar? That’s the foundation of manifestation and intention-setting. I wrote about how to use this in my Goal Setting Book.
These aren’t separate fields. They’re two sides of the same truth.
Science and spirituality aren’t at war. They’re finally speaking the same language.
Why this matters
Looking back, I see that my personal struggle mirrored something bigger:
For decades, society has told us we must choose — logic or intuition, science or spirituality, facts or feelings.
Here’s the truth:
We don’t have to choose. We need all of them.
When we integrate them, I believe decision-making becomes clearer, leadership becomes stronger, and self-trust becomes unshakable. I’ve written more about this heret: Harness The Wisdom Of Your 3 Brains To Manifest Your Dreams
If this post resonated
Thinky Things is a short, weekly-ish email — fresh reflections, questions, and small noticing-points — written for the inbox rather than the website.
No noise. No pressure. Unsubscribe anytime.
If this helped, feel free to share it with an other intuitive soul who might need it too.
I’d love to know if you have ever struggled between logic and intuition? Or have you noticed how science and spirituality are beginning to overlap?
Tags: 3 brains, Communication skills, Self-confidence and self-esteem, Spirituality, Thinking and mindset, work and career
I really enjoyed reading your post.I understand your past frustrations and who you are now. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for your comment, Lois, I’m glad you enjoyed my post. I hope that things have changed since my time in HR, and will continue to change.
Hi Steph. Yes! totally have experienced this. I also work in the power industry. I’m working In the IT area. I’m a Business Analyst. What we do is bridge the gap between the customer and the technical people. We dig into the requirements for issues and help facilitate the solution whatever that may be. As a more ‘experienced’ (read old) person I tend to use empathy to find issues and use lots of ‘feelings’ words to identify pain points and to help manage people through change. My technical colleagues hate this and my boss even tried to ‘performance manage’ it out of me. Needless to say I no longer report to him. One thing I’ve learned, you know when you’re not sitting in your values, it feels off and you’re not as effective as you know you can be. My daily challenge is to do the technical stuff without compromising my emotional and spiritual paths. Not always successful and feedback from some people can be disheartening. Thanks for starting this conversation. It’s so interesting.
Hi Raewyn, I so appreciate you sharing this! You’re walking a fine tightrope—bridging logic and tech while staying true to empathy and real human experiences. And I totally get what you mean about feeling off when you’re not sitting in your values—like wearing shoes that just don’t fit!
The fact that your boss tried to performance manage your empathy out of you? Mind-boggling! ???? But I love that you’ve held your ground. That takes real courage.
And yes—feedback from the logic-driven crowd can be disheartening, but what you’re doing matters. You’re not just solving problems; you’re making sure people feel heard. That’s rare, especially in IT.
Keep blending both worlds—logic without connection is just code without a user experience! Thanks for adding to this conversation—it’s so great to hear from someone in the thick of it!
Big appreciation, ❤️
Steph ????
Loved your article. Of course you are so right. In my experience everything comes back to the heart, but balanced with the brain and gut (intuition). I love that the science now backs it up.
Hi Liz, Thanks so much—I’m glad you loved it! And yes, isn’t it amazing how everything keeps circling back to the heart? It’s like the ultimate decision-making HQ—when it’s in balance with the brain and gut, everything just clicks.
I love that science is finally catching up too! It’s validating what so many of us have felt all along. Thanks for sharing your thoughts—it’s always great to connect with another like-minded person!
Hey Steph!
I loved reading your blog, too. It’s where I am at. I am actually really encouraged by how many mainstream scientists research the various fields of intuition (currently reading’ The Intention Experiment’, Lynne MacTaggert), heart maths science, mindfulness, meditation, intention, somatic modalities etc etc. It appears to be that we are only at the beginning of scientifically understanding what humans all around the world have experientially known for thousands of years.
I have recently described it to a medical doctor (Dr David Beaumont, ‘Positive Medicine’) this way…a few hundred years ago it was necessary for science to separate from the church. To rely on empirical evidence over “believe it because we say so”. And because of that scientific curiosity, we have so much more of an understanding how things work in this universe. For that I am grateful.
And now it feels like a ‘full circle moment’ from when that separation (well, at least in the west) of science and church/faith/’other knowing’ happened. (Some) scientist begin to understand that there is a gap. That it is often the lack of fine instruments, and the knowledge of how to measure certain things, rather than the actual lack of said ‘things’ that have stopped us being able to empirically show what’s there and how it works.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Quantum Physics for example will prove to us scientifically what all the spiritual teachings have tried to teach us, about ‘the one field’, consciousness and awareness and maybe much, much more.
Wouldn’t that be a ‘full circle moment’?? Science proving spiritual teaching?! Maybe not in my life time, but in the ‘next little while’ of human evolution.
Cheers
Tanja
Hey Tanja!
I love everything about this—your perspective, the full-circle moment, and the fact that more mainstream scientists are now exploring what humans have felt and known for centuries. It really does feel like we’re at the beginning of something huge, doesn’t it? Like science is finally catching up with spirituality, not to disprove it, but to explain it.
Your analogy of science separating from the church makes so much sense—there was a time when that divide was necessary for progress. But now, we’re seeing the limitations of that rigid separation, and as you said, it’s often not that something doesn’t exist, but that we don’t yet have the tools to measure it. The fact that scientists are even looking at intuition, intention, and consciousness as valid areas of study is massive.
And yes—Quantum Physics is already poking at these ideas! Observer effect, entanglement, the idea that reality shifts depending on how we interact with it… sounds a lot like what spiritual teachings have been saying all along, doesn’t it?
Will we see science fully proving spirituality in our lifetime? Dunno. But we’re certainly moving in that direction. And I’m very excited to see what unfolds next.
Thanks for such a thoughtful and fascinating comment—this conversation is just getting started!
Cheers,
Steph ????
Great! I am looking forward to the conversation continuing.
xx
I’ve just discovered this. What a wonderful read !!
Thank You for sharing this post on the web. I truly feel like I’m not alone in experiencing this kind of perception.
Thank you so much SV. I’m glad it helped you feel that you’re not alone. I do think we’re moving closer to accepting and integrating the many aspects of ourselves which we’ve sometimes shut down.